Armchair GM'ing PT II: Transition PHASE I
In accordance to what Quinn was talking about building a team for which rolling 4 lines could produce results both offensively and defensively, I tried to envision a lineup that could provide that. In both instances I have moved Brodziak to wing (yes, I know he's good at faceoffs) so that he can barrel down the RW and cause havoc in the low slot.
Lineup 1
New Guy – Horcoff – Hemsky
Penner – Gagner – Brodziak
Cogliano/Moreau – Reasoner – Pisani
Jacques – Spurgeon – Stortini
O’Sullivan
MacIntyre
Visnovsky Grebeshkov
Souray Komisarek
Peckham Staios
Strudwick
Major changes:
- New first line LW
- Nilsson, Smid and Gilbert are traded
- Brodziak on RW
- Reasoner returns
- Organization has to choose between Moreau or Cogliano
- Spurgeon makes the NHL team
- Komisarek is signed as a UFA
Lineup 2
Penner - Horcoff - Hemsky
O'Sullivan - Gagner - Pisani
Cogliano - New Guy - Brodziak
Jacques - Reasoner - Stortini
MacIntyre
Souray Visnovsky
Gilbert Grebeshkov
Peckham New Guy
Strudwick
Major changes:
- Moreau, Nilsson, Smid, and Staios are traded
- Brodziak on RW
- Reasoner returns
- A shutdown D-man is brought in to play with Peckham, who is NHL-ready; Shane Hnidy or Greg Zanon are possibilities
- A bonafide shutdown 3rd line center is signed via UFA or acquired by trade is now flanked by Cogliano on LW; this could be anybody from John Madden to Rob Neidermeyer
Come back tomorrow. This lineup will feature more "coke machines" and "refrigerators" than the first two I proposed.
1 Comments:
We only get Komi if we lose one of Souray/Visnovsky. Rumor is he's asking 5.5+.
Brodziak on the 2nd line as well won't pan out, unless you want a Top-10 pick again. And I'm sure you noticed this while doing this, we have no RW depth. Pisani/Brodziak are neither 2nd line RW's. Like I mentioned in mine, Stafford would be a great addition to our 2nd line RW spot, or resigning Kotalik would be fine as well.
May 30, 2009 at 8:03 PM
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home